Which of the following practices can help support an unbiased review process?

Implementing anonymous review systems is a key practice that can significantly support an unbiased review process. This approach helps to eliminate potential biases based on the identity of the reviewer or the author, allowing evaluations to be based purely on the quality of the work presented. When reviewers' identities are concealed, it reduces the influence of personal relationships, preconceived notions, or reputational biases that may affect judgment.

Anonymous reviews can also encourage a more honest assessment of the work, as reviewers may feel freer to express their true opinions without fear of backlash or judgment from their peers. This fosters an environment where critiques are based on merit rather than personal connections, ultimately leading to fairer and more constructive feedback.

In contrast, other practices such as encouraging collaboration among reviewers or allowing personal opinions can introduce subjective influences that may compromise impartiality. Similarly, while providing background information can enhance understanding, it may unintentionally lead to biases based on preconceived notions or expectations about the authors or their previous work.