If personal beliefs affect a researcher's objectivity, this is an example of which type of conflict?

When personal beliefs influence a researcher's objectivity in conducting research, it exemplifies a conflict of conscience. This type of conflict arises when a researcher finds themselves in a situation where their personal values, ethics, or moral beliefs may compromise their ability to carry out their research impartially. It highlights the struggle between the researcher's intrinsic beliefs and the ethical standards required for objective and unbiased scientific investigation.

In contrast, a financial conflict typically involves situations where financial interests or personal gain might compromise judgment or lead to biased outcomes in research. A conflict of interest is a broader term that encompasses different situations where personal or institutional interests could improperly influence research conduct or findings. An institutional conflict usually arises when an organization’s interests might affect its scientists' impartiality, often related to funding or institutional goals. Each of these kinds of conflicts can complicate research integrity, but the scenario described specifically points to the internal struggle related to personal beliefs and ethics, making it a perfect fit for conflict of conscience.